Jannik Sinner vs Andrey Rublev Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 02 Jun at 07:48 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Sinner vs A. Rublev

ITA
7
Win
Played
3
Win

RUS
7
Win
Played
3
Win
Head-To-Head: Sinner 7 - 3 Rublev
They have played 25 sets in total, with Jannik Sinner winning 18 and Andrey Rublev winning 7. The last match between Jannik Sinner and Andrey Rublev was at the French Open - Paris, 02-06-2025, Round: R4, Surface: Clay, with Jannik Sinner getting the victory 6-1 6-3 6-4.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Sinner | 7 |
Rublev | 3 |
Last H2H Matches:
(R4) French Open - Paris(06-02-25)
(QF) Western & Southern Open - Cincinnati(08-17-24)
(QF) National Bank Open - Montreal(08-10-24)
J. Sinner vs A. Rublev H2H Profile
J. Sinner vs A. Rublev Match Preview
- Recent second serve stats indicate Rublev has a slight edge, winning 45.6% of points compared to Sinner's 41.7%.
- In terms of recent return game effectiveness, Rublev also slightly outperforms Sinner, particularly on his opponent's second serve with Rublev winning 43.83% of these points versus Sinner's 38.24%.
- Under pressure, Rublev seems more resilient, saving 59.83% of breakpoints compared to Sinner's 53.29%.
- Looking at overall performance, Sinner has a remarkable win rate over the last year, winning 91.8% of his matches, dwarfing Rublev's 56.25% victory rate.
- Comparatively, Sinner's more favorable surface is indoor hard courts with an 80% win rate, while Rublev excels on outdoor hard courts with a 66% win rate.
- Sinner has demonstrated superior performance in Grand Slam matches, winning 91.67% while Rublev has focused more on main tour events, winning 64.86%.
- From their direct head-to-head encounters, Sinner leads with 6 wins out of 9 matches, with 15 set wins compared to Rublev's 7.
- How do they perform in high-pressure situations? In tiebreaks recorded against each other, Sinner has won all three.
- When the match goes to a deciding set, Sinner is more likely to clinch the win, having a 69% success rate over the last year compared to Rublev’s 45%.
- Sinner’s matches have generally been against higher-ranked opponents, suggesting tougher competition.
- Rublev has a slight advantage in break point conversion, outperforming Sinner with a 29.86% conversion rate.
Editorial Prediction (June 2, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performance patterns, Rublev has shown marginally better second serve statistics and return effectiveness. However, Sinner's dominance in overall performance, striking win rate, and proven success in direct encounters against Rublev give him a significant edge.
Sinner demonstrates exceptional resilience in crucial match moments, notably winning a higher percentage of deciding sets and dominating tiebreaks against Rublev.
Factoring in Sinner's consistency against higher-ranked opponents and his strong record on indoor hard courts, he appears better equipped to secure victory in this upcoming match. While Rublev's strengths are not to be discounted, Sinner's overall superior statistics make him a favorable pick to win.
Based on these insights, Jannik Sinner is most likely to win the upcoming match.
Jannik Sinner vs Andrey Rublev Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Sinner vs A. Rublev H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
7 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
18 | Sets Won | 7 |
132 | Games Won | 96 |
69 | Aces (Total) | 42 |
23 | Total Double Faults | 23 |
1:44:11 | Avg. Match Time | 1:44:11 |
58% (407/698) | 1st Serve % | 64% (475/740) |
76% (309/407) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (334/475) |
53% (155/291) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (102/265) |
45% (33/74) | Break Pts Won % | 35% (18/52) |
41% (304/740) | Return Pts Won % | 34% (234/698) |
83% (5/6) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 17% (1/6) |
67% (2/3) | Best‑of‑5 Win % | 33% (1/3) |
67% (2/3) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (1/3) |
83% (5/6) | 1st Set Won → Match Won | 50% (2/4) |
17% (1/6) | 1st Set Won → Match Lost | 50% (2/4) |
50% (2/4) | 1st Set Lost → Match Won | 17% (1/6) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Sinner Recent Matches Played
A. Rublev Recent Matches Played

J. Sinner vs A. Rublev Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
74.90% (385/129) | YTD Win/Loss | 64.39% (510/282) |
69.86% (927/400) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.26% (1222/806) |
56.62% (7166/5491) | Games Win/Loss | 53.19% (10611/9338) |
77.23% (156/46) | Hard Win/Loss | 65.92% (207/107) |
68.53% (98/45) | Clay Win/Loss | 63.33% (133/77) |
79.37% (100/26) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63.51% (141/81) |
72.09% (31/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 63.04% (29/17) |
0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.51 |
2707 | Aces Total | 4967 |
0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
1060 | Total Double Faults | 1995 |
1:50:3 | Average Match Time | 1:38:21 |
256.95 | Average Opponent Rank | 335.02 |
59% (22022/37224) | 1st Serve % | 60% (34676/57580) |
74% (16384/22022) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (25901/34676) |
54% (8275/15202) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (11684/22904) |
43% (1713/3976) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (2135/5473) |
41% (16053/39226) | Return Points Win % | 38% (22845/59783) |
81.08% (90/21) | Slam W/L | 70.16% (87/37) |
75.21% (88/29) | Masters W/L | 57.59% (91/67) |
93.75% (15/1) | Cups W/L | 73.91% (17/6) |
74.47% (105/36) | Main Tour W/L | 64.78% (206/112) |
83.33% (10/2) | Tour Finals W/L | 25.00% (4/12) |
66.67% (30/15) | Challenger W/L | 62.63% (62/37) |
65.28% (47/25) | Futures W/L | 81.13% (43/10) |
74% (291/395) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (420/662) |
81% (91/113) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (83/123) |
63% (122/194) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (194/369) |
62% (91/147) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (155/264) |
89% (369/330) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (480/419) |
11% (369/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (480/61) |
37% (145/54) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 29% (312/91) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
